| From: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? |
| Date: | 2012-11-07 13:33:19 |
| Message-ID: | 509A631F.2010507@boreham.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 11/6/2012 9:16 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>
> I've been benchmarking a E5-4640 (4 socket) and hyperthreading off
> gave much better scaling behaviour in pgbench (gentle rise and flatten
> off), whereas with hyperthreading on there was a dramatic falloff
> after approx number clients = number of (hyperthreaded) cpus. The box
> is intended to be a pure db server, so we are running with
> hyperthreading off.
It looks like this syndrome is not observed on my box, likely due to the
much lower number of cores system-wide (12).
I see pgbench tps increase nicely until #threads/clients == #cores, then
plateau. I tested up to 96 threads btw.
We're waiting on more memory modules to arrive. I'll post some test
results once we have all 4 memory banks populated.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2012-11-07 13:37:24 | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-11-07 11:43:09 | Re: dbt2 performance regresses from 9.1.6 to 9.2.1 |