> Expected? Should? The driver should implment SQLXML, but since that
> hasn't happened yet, it's expected that the only way to deal with it is
> via Strings. You can get around your original complaint via the
> stringtype=unspecified URL parameter so you don't have to go through
> PGobject, but long term we should use SQLXML.
>
> Kris Jurka
It was hardly a complaint, just a question about how one is expected to
handle the xml type via JDBC in the current version of the driver. Thank
you for the tip on stringtype=unspecified, that is another option for me.
-- m@