Re: commit problem

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: commit problem
Date: 2012-10-25 21:48:10
Message-ID: 5089B39A.2050106@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On 10/25/12 1:45 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Sounds ugly. What I wonder is why the your development team doesn't
> route all transaction completions through a common method. I have
> always seen that as the only sane way to do it. Then you have one
> place where you can change:
>
> conn.commit();

because my developers don't think simple reads ARE a transaction.

--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2012-10-25 21:56:18 Re: commit problem
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2012-10-25 20:45:34 Re: commit problem