From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mark Salter <msalter(at)redhat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: lock support for aarch64 |
Date: | 2013-05-13 15:53:48 |
Message-ID: | 5088.1368460428@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> On 13.05.2013 18:14, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Couldn't we just do
>> -#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__arm)
>> +#if defined(__arm__) || defined(__arm) || defined(__aarch64__)
> That would imply falling back to swpb instruction also on aarch64, which
> won't work.
It doesn't work on current ARM32 chips either, but no one has complained
about the existing coding. At least on ARM64 there'd be a likelihood
that you'd get an assembler error rather than an executable that crashes
at launch.
I suppose we could consider adding
#ifdef __aarch64__
#error ...
#endif
in the section for not-HAVE_GCC_INT_ATOMICS, but I'm doubtful it's
worth the trouble.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-05-13 16:10:04 | Re: Parallel Sort |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-05-13 15:48:44 | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |