Re: read only transactions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql(at)jamponi(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: read only transactions
Date: 2010-10-12 19:33:44
Message-ID: 5083.1286912024@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql(at)jamponi(dot)net> writes:
> Are there any performance implications (benefits) to executing queries
> in a transaction where
> SET TRANSACTION READ ONLY;
> has been executed?

No.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2010-10-12 20:32:31 Re: read only transactions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-12 18:58:13 Re: Slow count(*) again...