From: | Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: obtain the difference between successive rows |
Date: | 2012-10-20 16:59:03 |
Message-ID: | 5082D857.6000900@iol.ie |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 20/10/2012 17:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Raymond O'Donnell" <rod(at)iol(dot)ie> writes:
>> On 20/10/2012 17:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> FWIW, Postgres is reasonably smart about the case of multiple window
>>> functions with identical window definitions --- once you've got one
>>> lag() in the query, adding more isn't going to cost much.
>
>> Out of curiosity, would there be much difference between having multiple
>> lag()s in the SELECT and a single one in a CTE?
>
> Not sure what you're proposing? I don't see how you'd solve this
> problem with a CTE, at least not without a join, which seems unlikely
> to be a win.
Yes, I see what you mean.... was waving my hands a bit. :-)
Ray.
--
Raymond O'Donnell :: Galway :: Ireland
rod(at)iol(dot)ie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Mechtel | 2012-10-20 17:17:06 | subscribe |
Previous Message | Berend Tober | 2012-10-20 16:56:29 | Re: obtain the difference between successive rows |