Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>
To: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] CREATE QUEUE (log-only table) for londiste/pgQ ccompatibility
Date: 2012-10-19 11:17:03
Message-ID: 508136AF.6040407@krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/19/2012 04:26 AM, Ants Aasma wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hmm. Maybe we should think of implementing this as REMOTE TABLE, that
>> is a table which gets no real data stored locally but all insert got through
>> WAL
>> and are replayed as real inserts on slave side.
> FWIW, MySQL calls this exact concept the "black hole" storage engine.
In this case calling this WRITE ONLY TABLE does not seem so strange
anymore :)

Or even PERSISTENT WRITE ONLY TABLE to make the paradox more explicit.
>
> Regards,
> Ants Aasma

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru HANADA 2012-10-19 11:17:47 Re: Move postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2012-10-19 10:02:29 Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security