From: | Sébastien Lardière <slardiere(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr |
Subject: | Re: Truncate if exists |
Date: | 2012-10-09 09:28:53 |
Message-ID: | 5073EE55.1080004@hi-media.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/09/2012 11:09 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 9 October 2012 09:33, Sébastien Lardière <slardiere(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> With the help of Cédric, here's a patch changing the TRUNCATE TABLE
>> command, adding the IF EXISTS option to allow the presence in the list
>> of tables of a missing or invisible table.
>>
>> This meets the needs of scripts that should be run in different stages,
>> and do not always have the same visibility on the tables, as well as
>> DROP TABLE. Rather than rollback the entire TRUNCATE or transaction, we
>> prefer to ignore the absence of the table.
>>
>> It is a small patch which changes very little code, but that could be
>> quite useful.
> Agreed.
>
> Patch looks fine, but please observe the coding standards wrt nested brackets.
>
> Will apply in 48 hours barring objections.
>
> Anyone want to check for any other missing IF EXISTS capability in other DDL?
>
Indeed, brackets was not correct, it's better now (I think), and correct
some comments.
Thanks,
--
Sébastien Lardière
PostgreSQL DBA Team Manager
Hi-Media
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
truncateifexists-2.diff | text/x-patch | 5.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Reykja | 2012-10-09 09:51:15 | Re: Truncate if exists |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-10-09 09:11:13 | Re: Bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY |