From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Olivier Hubaut" <olivier(at)scmbb(dot)ulb(dot)ac(dot)be> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Data directory transfert fails between PPC and x86 |
Date: | 2004-09-21 14:13:05 |
Message-ID: | 507.1095775985@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
"Olivier Hubaut" <olivier(at)scmbb(dot)ulb(dot)ac(dot)be> writes:
> I used to make synchrnoistation between data directories with Rsync cause
> it's faster when synchronizing offline database than making a dump.
This has never been considered a supported technique. You can usually
get away with it if the source and destination machines are *exactly*
alike ... but if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces.
> It works really nice between all the PowerPC we used, but it doesn't work
> on x86 server (the postmaster refuses to start because the
> PG_CONTROL_VERSION is completly different). I think that the problem come
> from the endianess of the data structure.
Quite. In general the data files are platform-specific.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-09-21 20:47:32 | Re: windows docs? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-21 14:10:50 | Re: unable to add users |