Re: ARC patent

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Jeff Davis" <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Date: 2005-01-21 23:02:37
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE5623B@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Folks,

Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least unanswered.

Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?

As I said before, we might just get a promise of a full licence for if/when the patent is granted.

... John

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-01-21 23:12:16 Re: ARC patent
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2005-01-21 23:00:41 Re: [pgsql-hackers] Re: Translations at pgfoundry