Re: Suggestion for improving Archives

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion for improving Archives
Date: 2004-09-05 13:42:29
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE56192@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

>
> What code ? I've seen that last modified header and now it's gone.
> No stress on the archives, it's pure question of several lines of code
>

Yes, which is exactly what we wanted to avoid, more php code.

> it's not a portal page, it's just a message, why should it
> changed so often. I think I should teach our crawler to
> recognize if changes were cosmetic using fuzzy checksum.
>

No, but even something as simple as adding a new mailing list would then
cause you to recrawl the entire site.
I agree that the last-modified header is the best solution. (the value
of it being equal to the message date, that is)

... John

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-09-05 14:16:14 Re: Suggestion for improving Archives
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2004-09-05 13:27:09 Re: search.postgresql.org