From: | "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Dennis Bjorklund" <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 |
Date: | 2004-08-07 11:10:53 |
Message-ID: | 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE5608E@rodrick.geeknet.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Yea,. I know....
100000 - 10FFFF : 2 separate planes iirc
... John
-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Bjorklund [mailto:db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org]
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2004 9:06 PM
To: John Hansen
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii; tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, John Hansen wrote:
> should not allow them to be stored, since there might me someone using
> the high ranges for a private character set, which could very well be
> included in the specification some day.
There are areas reserved for private character sets.
--
/Dennis Björklund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-08-07 11:11:28 | Re: [PATCHES] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 |
Previous Message | John Hansen | 2004-08-07 11:09:22 | Re: [PATCHES] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-08-07 11:11:28 | Re: [PATCHES] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 |
Previous Message | John Hansen | 2004-08-07 11:09:22 | Re: [PATCHES] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 |