Re: someone working to add merge?

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: someone working to add merge?
Date: 2005-11-11 18:55:42
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A93B0@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I Wrote:

> From the mysql manual:
>
> 'REPLACE works exactly like INSERT, except that if an old
> record in the table has the same value as a new record for a
> PRIMARY KEY or a UNIQUE index, the old record is deleted
> before the new record is inserted. See Section 13.2.4,
> "INSERT Syntax".'

It also says:

Note that unless the table has a PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE index, using a
REPLACE statement makes no sense. It becomes equivalent to INSERT,
because there is no index to be used to determine whether a new row
duplicates another.

... John

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2005-11-11 19:00:14 Re: someone working to add merge?
Previous Message John Hansen 2005-11-11 18:54:00 Re: someone working to add merge?