Re: LGPL

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LGPL
Date: 2005-06-15 02:24:13
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A9346@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Agreed.
>
> With libreadline, we are not taking their code or
> distributing it, but merely linking to it if it exists. Now,
> some say that is enough to make us GPL, but many don't agree
> with that interpretation.

Right,. That's actually exactly what I meant: using GPL/LGPL libraries
by linking to them.

Responses

  • Re: LGPL at 2005-06-15 02:34:17 from Andrew Dunstan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-15 02:28:31 Re: LGPL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-15 02:21:51 Re: LGPL