Re: LGPL

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LGPL
Date: 2005-06-15 02:00:35
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A9343@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

What about GPL ?
I assume that's out of the question!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:59 AM
> To: John Hansen
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LGPL
>
>
> We already do ... libreadline ...
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, John Hansen wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason why we would not be able to use LGPL code in PG?
> >
> > ... John
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
> so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
> >
> >
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy
> ICQ: 7615664
>
>

Responses

  • Re: LGPL at 2005-06-15 02:11:19 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-15 02:10:35 Re: LGPL
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-06-15 01:59:20 Re: LGPL