From: | "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: LGPL |
Date: | 2005-06-15 02:00:35 |
Message-ID: | 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A9343@rodrick.geeknet.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
What about GPL ?
I assume that's out of the question!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 11:59 AM
> To: John Hansen
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LGPL
>
>
> We already do ... libreadline ...
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, John Hansen wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason why we would not be able to use LGPL code in PG?
> >
> > ... John
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of
> > broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
> so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
> >
> >
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy
> ICQ: 7615664
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-15 02:10:35 | Re: LGPL |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-06-15 01:59:20 | Re: LGPL |