Re: Patch for collation using ICU

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for collation using ICU
Date: 2005-05-08 03:59:05
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A930A@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I don't buy it. If current conversion tables does the right
> thing, why we need to replace. Or if conversion tables are
> not correct, why don't you fix it? I think the rule of
> character conversion will not change frequently, especially
> for LATIN languages. Thus maintaining cost is not too high.

I never said we need to, but if we're going to implement ICU,
then we might as well go all the way.

... John

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Madison Kelly 2005-05-08 04:02:37 Re: Invalid unicode in COPY problem
Previous Message John Hansen 2005-05-08 03:43:15 Re: Patch for collation using ICU