From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Rural Hunter <ruralhunter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
Date: | 2012-09-24 15:24:04 |
Message-ID: | 50607B14.1000906@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On 9/24/12 10:13 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> FWIW, what I found out last time I touched this code is that on many
> systems setlocale doesn't bother to return a canonicalized spelling;
> it just gives back the string you gave it. It might be worth doing
> what Peter suggests, just to be consistent with what we are doing
> elsewhere, but I'm not sure how much it will help.
It might not have anything to do with the current problem, but if initdb
canonicalizes locale names, then pg_upgrade also has to. Otherwise,
whenever an operating system changes its locale canonicalization rules,
pg_upgrade will fail.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-24 15:28:59 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-09-24 15:22:22 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-24 15:28:59 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-09-24 15:22:22 | Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |