Re: Windows Services and Postgresql 9.1.3

From: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Windows Services and Postgresql 9.1.3
Date: 2012-09-22 08:46:28
Message-ID: 505D7AE4.10600@ringerc.id.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

On 09/22/2012 06:25 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:33:25 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Vincent Dautremont
>> <vincent(at)searidgetech(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I'm using Postgresql 9.1.3 x64 on Windows 2008,
>>> I'm doing reliability tests and effects and consequences of a server
>>> power failure.
>>
>> If you're looking to test for reliability and bugginess, I'd highly
>> suggest testing against the latest minor version of 9.1.5.
>
> If reliability of interest, why is OP using Windows?

FWIW, my Win2k8 server has been rock solid since installation, with only
*extremely* infrequent reboots for patches as few of the issues patched
are network-exploitable.

These days Windows is a rather solid platform. It still weirds me out,
but that's how it is. I've had more stability issues on my Linux servers
lately (though that's significantly to do with some of the cheap and
nasty hardware they're on).

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-23 12:33:48 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-09-22 04:15:53 Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tuanhoanganh 2012-09-22 11:47:10 Re: PL/pgSQL debugger and PostgreSQL 9.2
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2012-09-22 08:34:27 Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT