Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT
Date: 2012-09-22 08:01:37
Message-ID: 505D7061.9000701@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2012-09-22 06:08 keltezéssel, John R Pierce írta:
> On 09/21/12 7:43 PM, David Johnston wrote:
>> Has there been any discussion regarding adding a time-limited version of NOWAIT, say:
>> “WAITONLY 50” (milliseconds), when dealing the explicit LOCK TABLE or the
>> SELECT…FOR(SHARE|UPDATE) commands?
>
> is this a feature in any other major databases?

Yes, at least Informix has it in the form of SET LOCK MODE TO { NOT WAIT | WAIT [N] }.

> is this in the sql spec?

No.

>
>
> what do you expect to happen if these timeouts expire? return an error, and abort the
> transaction?
>
>

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2012-09-22 08:04:48 Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT
Previous Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2012-09-22 07:29:22 Re: Curosity question regarding "LOCK" NOWAIT