From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jellej(at)pacbell(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Questions about 2 databases. |
Date: | 2005-03-11 20:33:42 |
Message-ID: | 5055.1110573222@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
jelle <jellej(at)pacbell(dot)net> writes:
> 1) on a single 7.4.6 postgres instance does each database have it own WAL
> file or is that shared? Is it the same on 8.0.x?
Shared.
> 2) what's the high performance way of moving 200 rows between similar
> tables on different databases? Does it matter if the databases are
> on the same or seperate postgres instances?
COPY would be my recommendation. For a no-programming-effort solution
you could just pipe the output of pg_dump --data-only -t mytable
into psql. Not sure if it's worth developing a custom application to
replace that.
> My web app does lots of inserts that aren't read until a session is
> complete. The plan is to put the heavy insert session onto a ramdisk based
> pg-db and transfer the relevant data to the master pg-db upon session
> completion. Currently running 7.4.6.
Unless you have a large proportion of sessions that are abandoned and
hence never need be transferred to the main database at all, this seems
like a dead waste of effort :-(. The work to put the data into the main
database isn't lessened at all; you've just added extra work to manage
the buffer database.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lou O'Quin | 2005-03-11 20:35:03 | Re: Query performance |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-11 20:21:12 | Re: Query performance |