| From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tables with lots of dead tuples despite autovacuum |
| Date: | 2012-09-13 00:07:06 |
| Message-ID: | 505123AA.9040901@hogranch.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 09/12/12 5:00 PM, Wells Oliver wrote:
> We have a few tables that are updated nightly on the order
> of deleting and inserting 500k records.
>
> I assumed autovacuum would do its thing and clean up the dead tuples,
> but in looking at pg_stat_user_tables, I notice there are lots and
> lots of dead tuples, on the order of a 500-600k.
>
> What can I do about this? Why isn't autovacuum cleaning these tables?
> Is this number of dead tuples acceptable?
>
> Lastly, would it make sense to do a weekly full manual vacuum + analyze?
>
how old is the oldest transaction in pg_stat_activity ? vacuum can't
free any tuples newer than this.
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sébastien Lorion | 2012-09-13 00:25:29 | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
| Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2012-09-13 00:04:58 | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |