[Adding the OP back to CC, in case he's not subscribed to the list]
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 09/09/12 14:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> "Pieter Viljoen Sr." wrote:
>>
>>> The TWO most important factors in hindering us to convert to
>>> Postgres are the following:
>>>
>>> Parallel execution of queries.
>>>
>>> No Table Partitioning
>>
>> Not a bug, so off-topic for this list. If you need help figuring
>> out how best to use PostgreSQL, or whether it is a good fit for
>> your use-case, a post to pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org would be more
>> appropriate.
>>
>>
>
> Or even -hackers - but it would make sense to ask 2 questions along
> the lines of:
>
> 1/ What is the current state of table partitioning...is anyone
> working on something a bit more native than abusing inheritance?
>
> 2/ Is anyone working on parallel query execution?
Yeah, I should have mentioned keeping each thread to a single topic.
But I would still think -novice or -general would be more appropriate
unless he was looking to write or sponsor packages for the features;
so it depends.
-Kevin