| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Creager <robert(at)logicalchaos(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results |
| Date: | 2012-09-09 15:45:43 |
| Message-ID: | 504CB9A7.5040004@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/09/2012 11:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah. I am going to add a config parameter to the buildfarm to allow
>> parallelism for the "make" and "make contrib" stages, but I'm not going
>> to release it until this is fixed.
> Well, why don't we stick .NOTPARALLEL in there for the moment, and then
> if Peter thinks of a better solution, he can revert that change in favor
> of something cleaner.
Works for me
>
> I assume we need this for all active branches, if the buildfarm is
> going to be stressing it?
>
>
I can restrict it to only modern branches. Didn't we supposedly improve
support for this during the 9.1 cycle? That seems like a sensible place
to go back to.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-09 15:50:54 | Re: build farm machine using <make -j 8> mixed results |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-09-09 15:36:43 | Re: embedded list v2 |