Re: bug of pg_trgm?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug of pg_trgm?
Date: 2012-09-06 21:24:24
Message-ID: 50491488.5090605@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 09/06/2012 05:09 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 08/20/2012 01:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> OK. Attached patch fixes the problem as you suggested, i.e., it backs up
>>>> "endword" if the second loop exits in an escape pair.
>>> Applied with a bit of further adjustment of the comments. Thanks!
>> When moving to a release with this change, will users need to reindex
>> trgm indexes?
> No. This only changes extraction of search trigrams from a LIKE pattern,
> not extraction of trigrams from text to be indexed.
>
>

OK, Thanks.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2012-09-07 00:33:33 improving python3 regression test setup
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-09-06 21:13:26 Re: BUG #7521: Cannot disable WAL log while using pg_dump