Re: PSQLException: FATAL: semctl(9335088, 3, SETVAL, 0) failed

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rajdeep Das <sendrajster(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PSQLException: FATAL: semctl(9335088, 3, SETVAL, 0) failed
Date: 2009-06-19 13:52:49
Message-ID: 5048.1245419569@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rajdeep Das <sendrajster(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am running postgresql 8.1 on winows 2003 R2 in a production scenario.

Don't do that. 8.1 for Windows was declared obsolete quite some time
ago. We are only supporting 8.2 and up.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-06-19 13:53:36 Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-19 13:47:01 Re: BUG #4862: different results in to_date() between 8.3.7 & 8.4.RC1