From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows |
Date: | 2012-09-03 17:47:17 |
Message-ID: | 5044ED25.6040300@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/03/2012 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> The attached very small patch allows pg_upgrade's "make check" to
>> succeed on REL9_2_STABLE on my Mingw system.
>> However, I consider the issue I mentioned earlier regarding use of
>> forward slashes in the argument to rmdir to be a significant blocker, so
>> I'm going to go and fix that and then pull this all together.
> My intentions over the next hour or two are to commit the
> unix-socket-directory fix and then sync 9.2 pg_upgrade with HEAD
> (ie, back-patch everything that's in HEAD except the int64-XLogRecPtr
> changes). Will that cause any problems for what you're doing?
>
>
No, go for it. I can sync up without difficulty. Does that include
backpatching the exec_prog changes to 9.2?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-03 17:49:58 | Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2012-09-03 17:43:00 | Re: Cascading replication and recovery_target_timeline='latest' |