| From: | Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer(at)linz(dot)govt(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | "SUNDAY A(dot) OLUTAYO" <olutayo(at)sadeeb(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server |
| Date: | 2012-08-25 09:15:47 |
| Message-ID: | 503897C3.90405@ringerc.id.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 08/25/2012 04:29 AM, Jeremy Palmer wrote:
> Marcus' guide looks great.
>
> So what's the pros/cons of using the Kerberos via GSSAPI method, rather than going for the SingleSignOn method mentioned by Sunday?
The method on the Ubuntu wiki applies to the host OS as a whole.
Pg will still need to know how to auth users. It's possible this'll work
via the "pam" authentication method on a system configured to auth users
against AD+LDAP or against Kerberos. I haven't tried. If so, that
approach is probably fine.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jukka Inkeri | 2012-08-25 09:19:09 | Permission denied for relation pg_database , one role has problem |
| Previous Message | Jukka Inkeri | 2012-08-25 09:06:17 | Permission denied for relation pg_database , one role has problem |