From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ... |
Date: | 2012-08-23 18:44:45 |
Message-ID: | 50367A1D.5030600@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/23/2012 01:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 08/23/2012 12:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Anybody who wants to fix it is surely welcome to, but I'm not going
>>> to consider this item as a reason to postpone RC1.
>> I'm not sure what you want done. I can test Amit's patch in a couple of
>> Windows environments (say XP+mingw and W7+MSVC) if that's what you need.
> Well, the patch as-is just adds another copy of code that really needs
> to be refactored into some new file in src/port/ or some such. That's
> not work I care to do while being unable to test the result ...
>
>
OK, I'll see if I can carve out a bit of time.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-23 18:50:07 | Re: default_isolation_level='serializable' crashes on Windows |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-23 18:02:45 | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |