Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ...

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2RC1 wraps this Thursday ...
Date: 2012-08-23 18:44:45
Message-ID: 50367A1D.5030600@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 08/23/2012 01:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 08/23/2012 12:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Anybody who wants to fix it is surely welcome to, but I'm not going
>>> to consider this item as a reason to postpone RC1.
>> I'm not sure what you want done. I can test Amit's patch in a couple of
>> Windows environments (say XP+mingw and W7+MSVC) if that's what you need.
> Well, the patch as-is just adds another copy of code that really needs
> to be refactored into some new file in src/port/ or some such. That's
> not work I care to do while being unable to test the result ...
>
>

OK, I'll see if I can carve out a bit of time.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-08-23 18:50:07 Re: default_isolation_level='serializable' crashes on Windows
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-08-23 18:02:45 Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?