Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simplifying our Trap/Assert infrastructure
Date: 2022-10-31 13:14:10
Message-ID: 503616.1667222050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I don't think we need separate definitions for frontend and backend,
> since the contained Assert() will take care of the difference. So the
> attached would be simpler.

WFM.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2022-10-31 13:14:15 Split index and table statistics into different types of stats
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2022-10-31 12:55:13 Re: Limit of WAL LSN value of type pg_lsn