From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Matteo Beccati" <php(at)beccati(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5255: COUNT(*) returns wrong result with LEFT JOIN |
Date: | 2009-12-25 16:38:53 |
Message-ID: | 5034.1261759133@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Matteo Beccati" <php(at)beccati(dot)com> writes:
> With the following data set a SELECT * query returns 1 rows, while SELECT
> COUNT(*) returns 2.
Hm, looks like the join-elimination patch is firing mistakenly. It's not
so much the count(*) that does it as the lack of any select-list
references to a:
regression=# explain SELECT * FROM b LEFT JOIN a ON (b.a_id = a.id) WHERE (a.id IS NULL OR a.id > 0);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Left Join (cost=64.00..132.85 rows=720 width=12)
Hash Cond: (b.a_id = a.id)
Filter: ((a.id IS NULL) OR (a.id > 0))
-> Seq Scan on b (cost=0.00..31.40 rows=2140 width=8)
-> Hash (cost=34.00..34.00 rows=2400 width=4)
-> Seq Scan on a (cost=0.00..34.00 rows=2400 width=4)
(6 rows)
regression=# explain SELECT b.* FROM b LEFT JOIN a ON (b.a_id = a.id) WHERE (a.id IS NULL OR a.id > 0);
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on b (cost=0.00..31.40 rows=2140 width=8)
(1 row)
I guess we missed something about when it's safe to do this optimization.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-25 17:13:00 | Re: BUG #5255: COUNT(*) returns wrong result with LEFT JOIN |
Previous Message | Matteo Beccati | 2009-12-25 10:43:40 | BUG #5255: COUNT(*) returns wrong result with LEFT JOIN |