| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |
| Date: | 2012-08-20 20:26:46 |
| Message-ID: | 50329D86.8030808@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/20/2012 01:21 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
>> I don't think US export regulations are the only issue. Some other
>> countries (mostly the usual suspects) forbid the use of crypto software.
>> If we build more crypto functions into the core we make it harder to use
>> Postgres legally in those places.
I fail to see how that is our problem. We shouldn't make the software
less useful because of those places.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-20 20:27:46 | Re: Large number of open(2) calls with bulk INSERT into empty table |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-08-20 20:21:07 | Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? |