Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Steve Singer <ssinger(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC connections to 9.1
Date: 2011-04-19 16:32:28
Message-ID: 5030.1303230748@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Tom Lane wrote:
>> For purposes of the notes in the server-side fix, could you state which
>> JDBC driver versions these changes will first appear in?

> This is in 9.1dev-900 and won't be backpatched.

OK, thanks. I've committed a patch to keep the server from
canonicalizing a setting of "UNICODE" (but not any other variations).
That should keep older drivers from breaking, and in a few years we
can remove the kluge, if anyone bothers ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-04-19 16:33:27 Re: pgbench \for or similar loop
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2011-04-19 16:27:45 Re: pgbench \for or similar loop

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message bubba postgres 2011-04-20 03:43:53 Transport Compression (whatever became of that discussion?)
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-04-19 16:02:44 Re: Test suite fails on non-default configuration