| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch Count? |
| Date: | 2005-02-06 17:36:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5022.1107711405@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> You just consider the plain text attachments. What about the encoded
> attachments [1] and the gziped [2] ones?
And what of people who sent patches in-line (not as MIME-ified
attachments)? Or who sent them to -hackers instead of -patches?
Trolling -hackers for attachments would require a deal of manual
attention, unfortunately, because a lot of messages of that kind
would be bug reports not patches. I'm not real sure that there
aren't some non-patch attachments on -patches as well.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2005-02-06 17:45:42 | Re: Failed assertion on cluster |
| Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2005-02-06 17:29:52 | Re: Query optimizer 8.0.1 (and 8.0) |