From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Replace pgindent shell script with Perl script. Update perltidy |
Date: | 2012-08-04 22:22:56 |
Message-ID: | 501DA0C0.5000506@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 08/04/2012 05:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> On 08/04/2012 03:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm not sure if we have any project policy for minimum required Perl
>>> version, but I've not found that any of our other Perl scripts don't
>>> work with 5.8.
>> Well, It's at least in 5.10.1 which dates from 3 years ago. I suspect
>> it's probably in 5.10.0 which dates from about 5 years ago. I guess this
>> is the danger of developing on modern systems :-) How old is the
>> compiler you use for everyday work?
> I intentionally use oldest-supported-versions of tools on my HPPA box,
> to keep us honest on that front. It's running gcc 2.95.3, since you
> asked, but that's not too relevant to the immediate question: what do
> we consider our oldest supported version of Perl? If we decide it's
> not 5.8, I'll reinstall that ... but allowing \h seems a pretty lame
> excuse for ratcheting up a whole major release series.
>
>
Sure. I think 5.8.x should be fine. 5.8.1 looks like our minimum to
build plperl:
./pl/plperl/plc_perlboot.pl:use 5.008001;
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-05 03:26:51 | Re: pgsql: Replace pgindent shell script with Perl script. Update perltidy |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-08-04 21:55:51 | Re: pgsql: Replace pgindent shell script with Perl script. Update perltidy |