Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
Date: 2004-05-07 15:09:36
Message-ID: 5015.1083942576@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> I guess the activity just totally outran the ability of autovac to keep up.

Could you have been bit by autovac's bug with misreading '3e6' as '3'?
If you don't have a recent version it's likely to fail to vacuum large
tables often enough.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-07 15:11:08 Re: My database hurts "ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint"
Previous Message Eric Ridge 2004-05-07 14:23:48 Re: Changing the size of a varchar field