Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date: 2009-09-10 17:36:46
Message-ID: 5014.1252604206@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Sep 10, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is that what's being proposed?

> I think that's what currently works, given the limitations of arrays
> (variadic arguments) to a single data type.

Well, at the very least the parameter markers should be spelled "%s",
so that there's some hope of upward compatibility with a more complete
implementation.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-09-10 17:52:14 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-10 17:22:24 Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types