Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]
Date: 2004-03-08 19:55:14
Message-ID: 50099.80.177.99.193.1078775714.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It's rumoured that Andrew Dunstan once said:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>>Another problem is that pg_description is per-database, while
>>pg_user/group are global for all databases.
>>
>>
>>
> databases are also per cluster, but we have comments on those.
>
> Could we keep the user/group comments in those tables instead of in
> pg_description?

Ahh, just like they used to live in pg_language.lancompiler for languages :-)

Regards, Dave

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-03-08 20:15:09 Re: socket calls in signal handler (WAS: APC + socket restrictions un der Win32?)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-08 19:46:21 Re: COMMENT ON [GROUP/USER]