From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de> |
Cc: | <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgadmin3 query tools |
Date: | 2003-04-02 12:44:55 |
Message-ID: | 50054.80.177.99.193.1049287495.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
It's rumoured that Andreas Pflug once said:
> Exactly. I've seen quite a lot of querying tools, and most of them were
> quite ugly and at the edge of usability. For my experience, I think
> two tool windows are the easiest way to handle it, not only in
> concerning coding, but also regarding user handling. The best tool
> I've been working with was MSSQL2000's ISQLW, which does use separate
> windows for editing and arbitrary query output. And pgadmin3 is going
> to be better, because its schema representation is better.
Yup, certainly is. BTW, did you know that thanks to Frank Lupo, pga2 fully
supports Casts and Conversions in the schema now?
> For a programmer, acceptance stands and falls by the tools. We are on
> the way to supply a tool that leaves virtually no wishes. Let's show
> those big companies that open software is better! Who needs O.., who
> needs M..., we got PostgreSQL!
Damn straight!! :-)
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-04-02 12:54:59 | Re: Qeustion pgadmin2 develop |
Previous Message | frank_lupo | 2003-04-02 12:41:06 | Qeustion pgadmin2 develop |