| From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework |
| Date: | 2012-07-13 21:37:50 |
| Message-ID: | 5000952E.4040105@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012-07-13 22:32 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
> 2012-07-12 19:05 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
>
>> I haven't really looked at the second patch yet, but at minimum that
>> will need some rebasing to match the API tweaks here.
>
> Yes, I will do that.
While doing it, I discovered another bug you introduced.
enable_timeout_after(..., 0); would set an alarm instead of ignoring it.
Try SET deadlock_timeout = 0;
Same for enable_timeout_at(..., fin_time): if fin_time points to the past,
it enables a huge timeout that wouldn't possibly trigger for short
transactions but it's a bug nevertheless.
>
> Thanks for your review and work.
>
> Best regards,
> Zoltán Böszörményi
>
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2012-07-13 21:41:41 | Re: initdb and fsync |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-13 21:35:06 | Re: initdb and fsync |