From: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
---|---|
To: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The ..... worm |
Date: | 2003-08-23 05:53:25 |
Message-ID: | 5.2.1.1.1.20030823134710.01bc3668@mbox.jaring.my |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thing is, in my case it wasn't due to that many people, most were mainly
from one guy at rr.com
Common header:
Received: from LANCE (cs6711150-130.satx.rr.com [67.11.150.130])
And he was the source of 260 in one day, total so far = 609!
Really not sure why that happened - shouldn't the worm be sending to many
and not blast just one address. Is it blasting 500 copies to each person on
all the lists- but how's that going to make it spread faster.
At 02:18 PM 8/22/2003 -0700, Dennis Gearon wrote:
><OT about the worm>
>Jeessh, a lot of people have my email address.
>
>I have received about 500 copies of the worm in the last 24 hours. My mail
>spool at work was sooooo full I couldn't get out or relay or anything. The
>wierd part is that it's my work address, and I'm subscribed to almost all
>my lists through the address above or my previous home address. YEARS ago
>I was using the work address for lists, but not for a LOOOOOOOOOOOONG time.
></OT about the worm>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-08-23 10:33:35 | Re: Single-file DBs WAS: Need concrete 'Why Postgres |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2003-08-23 02:48:55 | Re: Single-file DBs WAS: Need concrete "Why Postgres |