From: | Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest(at)vogelsinger(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jonathan Bartlett <johnnyb(at)eskimo(dot)com>, <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: |
Date: | 2003-06-18 17:29:05 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.1.6.2.20030618192641.03c6ebf8@mail.vogelsinger.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 18:12 18.06.2003, scott.marlowe said:
--------------------[snip]--------------------
>is worth it. Having lost a RAID5 set to a hw controller that simply had
>the cable to two drives come loose but refused to accept them back into
>the RAID5 after that without formatting them first, I'm no longer as wild
>about hw raid controllers as I once was.
--------------------[snip]--------------------
Say - you didn't test it before going production?
;-))
Never mind - I was that ignorant myself. However my current RAID V's are
tested above the specs - installed RH7.2, removed 2 (sic!) disks, and
remounted. The controller complained (of course) but still offered to try
to remount - bingo, worked.
I feel somehow safe now.
--
>O Ernest E. Vogelsinger
(\) ICQ #13394035
^ http://www.vogelsinger.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-06-18 17:32:04 | Re: A creepy story about dates. How to prevent it? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-18 17:25:37 | Re: pg_options in postgres 7.3.2 |