Re: RE : full featured alter table?

From: Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest(at)vogelsinger(dot)at>
To: jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RE : full featured alter table?
Date: 2003-06-16 13:45:03
Message-ID: 5.1.1.6.2.20030616154213.03ce7be0@mail.vogelsinger.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 07:55 16.06.2003, Jim C. Nasby said:
--------------------[snip]--------------------
>99.999% of the time, if you put SELECT * into code, you should be strung
>up by your own entrails. But do you mean to tell me that when you're
>testing stuff on the command line you never, ever use SELECT *?
--------------------[snip]--------------------

Sure I do. But I don't really care about column ordering when doing a
SELECT * from the psql command line. If I care I usually have a dummy file
named "x" (because that's so damn short ;->), hack in my complex test
queries there, and do a \i x in psql. If I just want to see if something's
there (or not) I'm not interected in column order. Are you?

Basically as I understand it, SELECT * means "gimme all", not in any
particular order. How if at all is that defined in ANSI SQL?

--
>O Ernest E. Vogelsinger
(\) ICQ #13394035
^ http://www.vogelsinger.at/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Csaba Nagy 2003-06-16 13:47:48 Re: Why can't you define a table alias on an update?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-16 13:42:21 Re: Why can't you define a table alias on an update?