From: | Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest(at)vogelsinger(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | jim(at)nasby(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RE : full featured alter table? |
Date: | 2003-06-16 13:45:03 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.1.6.2.20030616154213.03ce7be0@mail.vogelsinger.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
At 07:55 16.06.2003, Jim C. Nasby said:
--------------------[snip]--------------------
>99.999% of the time, if you put SELECT * into code, you should be strung
>up by your own entrails. But do you mean to tell me that when you're
>testing stuff on the command line you never, ever use SELECT *?
--------------------[snip]--------------------
Sure I do. But I don't really care about column ordering when doing a
SELECT * from the psql command line. If I care I usually have a dummy file
named "x" (because that's so damn short ;->), hack in my complex test
queries there, and do a \i x in psql. If I just want to see if something's
there (or not) I'm not interected in column order. Are you?
Basically as I understand it, SELECT * means "gimme all", not in any
particular order. How if at all is that defined in ANSI SQL?
--
>O Ernest E. Vogelsinger
(\) ICQ #13394035
^ http://www.vogelsinger.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Csaba Nagy | 2003-06-16 13:47:48 | Re: Why can't you define a table alias on an update? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-16 13:42:21 | Re: Why can't you define a table alias on an update? |