From: | Naomi Walker <nwalker(at)eldocomp(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bradley Kieser <brad(at)kieser(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tony and Bryn Reina <reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
Date: | 2004-04-02 17:42:59 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.2.20040402104208.03fb26b8@imap.eldocomp.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
At 03:36 AM 4/2/2004, Bradley Kieser wrote:
>Hi Tony,
>Yep, for the time being you're pretty much limited to this for a table. As
>far as commercial DBs go, IMHO (without knowing about DB2) Oracle is the
>only player in town that will realistically deal with table sizes in the
>order of 100sGB or more. Ingres has limitations similar to PG although
>they will deny it, Informix I am a little bit rusty on now but certainly
>when I used it last it didn't scale up much past the low ordinal GBs per
>table and Sybase, IM v HO, is a joke anyway. Hope I don't offend anyone
>with that last statement!
For the record, I ran Informix with 100G size databases, with no problem.
-- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE --
This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended addressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use, copy, disclose or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email, and delete the message. Thank you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bradley Kieser | 2004-04-02 17:46:39 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-04-02 17:41:32 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |