Re:

From: elein <elein(at)norcov(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers(at)empires(dot)org>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2002-09-11 19:58:10
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.2.20020911125626.054f5070@pop.norcov.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


yes, deferring views to the end will also break if you have
SQL functions defined that use views. The dependencies
is (are?) a really hard problem.

elein

At 12:41 PM 9/11/02, Jeff Davis wrote:

> > Is it not enough to defer all views until the end? Why would they be
> > needed any sooner?
>
>I would think that views of views, or permissions on views, or prepared
>statements might need the right view to be declared first. There may be other
>examples as well.
>
>Your solution might be better than the current situation, however.
>
>Regards,
> Jeff
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:
elein(at)norcov(dot)com (510)543-6079
"Taking a Trip. Not taking a Trip." --anonymous
:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:

In response to

  • Re: at 2002-09-11 19:41:11 from Jeff Davis

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-09-11 19:59:10 Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2002-09-11 19:41:11 Re: