From: | elein <elein(at)norcov(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers(at)empires(dot)org>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: |
Date: | 2002-09-11 19:58:10 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.2.20020911125626.054f5070@pop.norcov.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
yes, deferring views to the end will also break if you have
SQL functions defined that use views. The dependencies
is (are?) a really hard problem.
elein
At 12:41 PM 9/11/02, Jeff Davis wrote:
> > Is it not enough to defer all views until the end? Why would they be
> > needed any sooner?
>
>I would think that views of views, or permissions on views, or prepared
>statements might need the right view to be declared first. There may be other
>examples as well.
>
>Your solution might be better than the current situation, however.
>
>Regards,
> Jeff
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:
elein(at)norcov(dot)com (510)543-6079
"Taking a Trip. Not taking a Trip." --anonymous
:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-09-11 19:59:10 | Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2002-09-11 19:41:11 | Re: |