From: | Doug Fields <dfields-pg-general(at)pexicom(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter A(dot) Daly" <petedaly(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Non-linear Performance |
Date: | 2002-06-08 04:28:18 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.2.20020608002527.01ebf860@pop.pexicom.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have my Dual P4-Xeon 2.4 ghz 8gb RAM Adaptec SCSI RAID 5 PostgreSQL
server coming in Friday, from my vendor POGO Linux (highly recommended). I
expect most of the 8gb to be used by buffer cache directly by the operating
system. I will let you know how it compares to the dual P3-1ghz 2GB IDE
RAID 1 server we use now.
The server cost just over half the price of a DB2 enterprise single-CPU
license. Thank god for Postgres!
My biggest fear is that the added CPU speed will be sub-linear, and that
the real speed improvement would come if PG would multi-thread individual
queries.
Cheers,
Doug
At 11:42 PM 6/7/2002, Peter A. Daly wrote:
>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>>
>>I am curious how you are going to address >4 gig of RAM on a 32-bit
>>system, especially if you want to address it all from the same process.
>Frankly, I don't know. I have been told the machine can hold 8 gig of
>ram. I have heard rumors about how Linux plays some games with how it
>allocates memory to use over 4 gigs of memory. but have no direct
>knowledge myself of the matter. Something alongs the lines of a single
>process being able to use up to 4 gig of memory. Not sure on the
>specifics. Looks like we will not be upgrading the database server for at
>least another 60 days (the postgres one at least), and the dual Xeon (Quad
>soon?) may have another purpose. We have a 1.5tb file server/image
>rendering machine that is out of space for expansion. The Xeon has enough
>PCI slots to let us add more RAID arrays for a lot longer, where the
>current server is out of slots. This being the case, I have stopped
>trying to milk speed out of postgres on that machine.
>
>On the positive side of this, I may get a higher end Quad Xeon after July
>for the next Postgres box. We have our eyes on Quad 700mhx Xeon, 8gig ram
>boxes.
>
>-Pete
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ken Williams | 2002-06-08 06:45:41 | Re: Problem with indexes, LIMIT, ORDER BY ... DESC |
Previous Message | Peter A. Daly | 2002-06-08 03:42:43 | Re: Non-linear Performance |