Re: PostgreSQL HardWare

From: Len Conrad <LConrad(at)Go2France(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL HardWare
Date: 2002-01-05 16:50:56
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.2.20020105104709.03b51538@mail.Go2France.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>When you compare the
>significant performance difference between a Pentium 133 and a P3/650, I
>think that says a LOT about the merits of multi-processor systems.

It think that says both systems are disk i/o bound, so the faster's CPU
power is wasted.

My bet would be extra money going into the disk system, like battery-backed
caching controllers, and separating transaction logging disk from data
storage disk.

Len

http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training
http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.4 for NT4 & W2K
http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brent R. Matzelle 2002-01-05 16:57:35 Re: PostgreSQL GUI
Previous Message Marek Pętlicki 2002-01-05 16:21:51 Re: PostgreSQL GUI