From: | Dave Harkness <daveh(at)MEconomy(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>, Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch for jdbc2 ResultSet.java |
Date: | 2001-09-06 02:57:00 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.2.20010905195252.045d8158@mail.meconomy.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
At 12:41 PM 9/5/2001, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>new patch:
There still seems to be an error with the same if-block.
! if (index>=-rows.size())
! internalIndex=rows.size()+index;
becomes
! if (index > -rows_size)
! internalIndex = rows_size+index;
Note that the original used >=, not >.
Also, why is the first edit being done? Granted it's faster in that it
doesn't null out the array of rows, but won't that have other effects? I'm
not very familiar with the code, so pardon if I'm off base on that.
//release resources held (memory for tuples)
if(rows!=null) {
- rows.setSize(0);
rows=null;
}
Peace,
Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-06 03:11:29 | Re: JDBC Statement.executeBatch patch |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-09-06 00:40:42 | Re: Read transactions don't work on 7.0.x db's 3rd attempt |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-06 03:11:29 | Re: JDBC Statement.executeBatch patch |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-09-06 02:56:42 | Re: Patch for pl/tcl Tcl_ExternalToUtf and Tcl_UtfToExternal |