| From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Date: | 2002-10-04 03:15:29 |
| Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.0.20021004131217.0282b2a0@mail.rhyme.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 11:07 PM 3/10/2002 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>A non-integral representation
>of off_t is theoretically possible but I don't believe it exists in
>practice.
Excellent. So I can just read/write the bytes in an appropriate order and
expect whatever size it is to be a single intXX.
Fine with me, unless anybody voices another opinion in the next day, I will
proceed. I just have this vague recollection of seeing a header file with a
more complex structure for off_t. I'm probably dreaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-04 03:39:23 | Re: Return of INSTEAD rules |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-04 03:10:19 | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |