Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Date: 2002-04-24 05:58:15
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.0.20020424155702.02a2f3c0@mail.rhyme.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 16:46 15/04/02 +0200, Mario Weilguni wrote:
>And how about getting database internals via SQL-functions - e.g. getting
>BLCSIZE, LOBBLCSIZE?

ISTM that there would be some merit in making a selection of compile-time
options available via SQL. Is this worth considering?

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-04-24 06:13:59 Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-04-24 05:41:00 Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch