From: | "Tegge, Bernd" <tegge(at)repas-aeg(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Igor Kovalenko <Igor(dot)Kovalenko(at)motorola(dot)com>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgres on QNX |
Date: | 2001-11-10 19:29:47 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.0.20011110202101.030fdec0@dragon.dr.repas.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-ports |
At 13:48 10.11.01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>"Tegge, Bernd" <tegge(at)repas-aeg(dot)de> writes:
> > It looks like QNX qsort does in fact call the comparison
> > function to compare a tuple with itself (tuple pointers a and b have
> > the same value).
>
>Interesting. That would explain the failure during CREATE INDEX,
>but we don't use qsort() while inserting into an existing index.
Yup, that is why I was able to insert the rows after creating the
index but not to recreate it after the drop.
>So I'm still wondering about Igor's report of a duplicate-key
>failure in CREATE VIEW. Are you able to duplicate that?
Sorry, but the QNX4 version doesn't even get to that point during
the regression tests (due to lack of support for dynamic loading).
I have to let Igor look into this.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-10 21:10:06 | Re: [Solution] PG 7.1.3 & MacOS X (10.1) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-10 18:48:20 | Re: Postgres on QNX |